- About us
- FPIN Institute
- Get Started with a Workshop
What are PURLs?
PURLs generate new evidence-based recommendations for practice for family physicians and other primary care clinicians. PURLs are stimulated by the publication of new research that meets criteria for a new recommendation to change practice. The completed PURLs are published exclusively in The Journal of Family Practice. To learn more about PURLs published in JFP go HERE
What are the criteria for PURLs?
Each PURL must meet six criteria:
• Relevance: Relevance to family medicine and primary care
The purpose of the PURLs Surveillance System is to engage communities of clinicians and methodologists in the identification, evaluation, and dissemination of PURLs; and to accelerate the translation of new research findings into clinical practice.
What is the process for identifying and evaluating PURLs?
There are five steps in the identification and evaluation of a PURL:
• Nomination of a Potential PURL: Many designated family physicians perform literature surveillance of multiple sources for new research and nominate studies via e-mail that seem like they might change practice as judged by reading the abstract. If the PURLs Editor agrees, then the study is assigned for formal review as a Potential PURL.
• Review of a Potential PURL: This includes a formal critical appraisal and literature review which is recorded on a standardized form (the Potential PURL Review Form), submitted to the PURLs Editor and presented to a peer group at a PURL Jam, similar to a journal club format. If the study seems as though it will meet criteria for a PURL and is approved by the PURLs Editor, it goes to the next step, Pending PURL for Review.
• Pending PURL: In this step the PURLs editor sends the review to The Journal of Family Practice. The study and written summary of the findings from the first three steps of the review are evaluated by the JFP editor, who either accepts it as a topic for a PURL manuscript for publication or not.
• PURL Manuscript Preparation: If the JFP Editor accepts the study as a PURL, then a manuscript summarizing the practice change, the summary of the study, and our analysis is written for publication in JFP as a PURL.
• PURLs Instant Polls: Online “instant” polls are conducted to engage practicing physicians in dialogue and feedback about the new practice recommendation in the PURL as a part of evaluating and disseminating the research. We believe that the publication of a PURL is only one step in the process of evaluating research that changes practice.
What sources are used to nominate Potential PURLs?
The PURL surveillance team, a group of 12 physicians from ten departments of family medicine, nominates articles from 27 primary journals and secondary sources. The nomination listserv consists of over 50 physicians around the country who weigh in on the PURLhood of nominations
In addition, nominations are accepted from any source. Our goal is to identify every research study that should lead to a change in practice for family physicians and other primary care clinicians so if we have missed any studies through our formal surveillance systems, we want to hear about them. If we have missed a study we will review it and seriously consider it as a PURL.
Who should I contact for more information?
Contact the PURLs Project Manager PURLs@fpin.org, for more information.
FPIN is looking for Peer Reviewers! There are many benefits to peer reviewing a manuscript, among some of them are: Peer review is reportable as faculty scholarly activity on annual ACGME reports, Peer review may fulfill local university scholarly activity requirements, Peer review can be included on curriculum vitae, Peer review provides further experience with the medical literature that can improve skill in critical appraisal and medical writing. Interested? To sign up to become an FPIN Peer Reviewer, go HERE and click "Register Now".